2019-2020: The Activist

By 2019, Swift’s politics were no mystery. She was openly in favor of gun-control reform, took a pro-choice stance against government attempts to crack down on abortion, gave a surprise performance at New York’s Stonewall Inn for that year’s Pride celebration, and urged the senate to pass anti-discrimination laws. Any far-right fan clinging to the notion that she harbored extremist views would’ve been in clinical denial. For the most part, conservative commentators got in the habit of attacking her as they would any other liberal entertainer with a massive platform. Ben Shapiro, for one, complained of her “abrupt and obviously pandering shift into a political wokescold.”   

At last, Swift also formally denounced any admiration from the racist far right in a cover story interview with Rolling Stone. “There’s literally nothing worse than white supremacy,” she said. “It’s repulsive. There should be no place for it.” She explained that she feared a 2016 endorsement of Hillary Clinton could have backfired, since Clinton’s celebrity support was “used against her in a lot of ways.” As for conservatives who had once assumed she was on their side, she quipped, “I don’t think they do anymore.”

In 2020, after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer, Swift came out strongly in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. “Racial injustice has been ingrained deeply into local and state governments, and changes MUST be made there,” she tweeted that June, and donated to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, encouraging her fans to do likewise. She also strongly criticized Trump’s threats of violent crackdowns on BLM protests in a tweet that promised: “We will vote you out in November.”

Around the same time, she called for the removal of Confederate monuments that “celebrate racist historical figures who did evil things.” During the presidential election, she criticized Trump and officially endorsed the Biden-Harris ticket, saying the Democratic nominees would begin a “healing process.” Fair to say that whatever remaining allure she had for reactionaries and Trump voters had completely dried up.     

2021-2024: Taylor Derangement Syndrome

The “aryan goddess” interpretation of Swift had been more or less put to bed by the time Biden assumed office. But the reorganizing MAGA right had little reason to single her out among the legions of professional entertainers who express their distaste for Trump here and there. She didn’t endorse candidates in the 2022 midterms, either, though she did communicate her dismay at the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Conservatives who bothered to take a swipe at her tended toward lazy outrage bait: calling her boring, overrated, or a lonely cat lady (mind you, she was in a long-term relationship with actor Joe Alwyn that was heavily covered by the tabloids). In 2021, Swift embarked on the formidable project of rerecording her first six studio albums after the rights to that catalog were sold to a company run by controversial music mogul Scooter Braun, and released the hit record Midnights in 2022.

It was in 2023 that American conservatism launched into an enduring freakout about Swift, her cultural dominance, and her potential influence on voters. Anyone dimly aware of the Eras Tour — an unprecedented run of sold-out stadium shows — could see she had reached another pinnacle of success, and amassed a near-cultish audience of millions who hung on her every utterance. We got plenty of think pieces on whether this was a good or bad phenomenon, with varied musings on how Swift had created her own monoculture. The sheer saturation of Taylor content was enough to irk those less disposed to her vibe — and there were gripes about that, too.

In the fall, confirmation of a budding romance between Swift, who had broken up with Alwyn earlier in the year, with Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce sent right-wingers over the edge. Was it not enough that Swift should have a chokehold on the music industry, these detractors asked. Did she have to conquer their sacred sport of football as well, shown every few minutes in cutaway reaction shots as she cheered Kelce on from his private stadium suite, with NFL announcers shoehorning the titles of her songs into play calls? Her cheerleader energy was distinctly unwelcome in the game; berserk haters told her she was “ruining football” and tried to manifest a Taylor “curse” for the Chiefs, who nonetheless won the AFC championship and will return to the Super Bowl after winning it last year.

Along the way, crusty conservative publications disgorged a slew of anti-Swiftie polemics. The National Review hardly paused their parade of takes, railing against both “The Incoherence of Taylor Swift” and “The Averageness of Taylor Swift” when they weren’t warning that “Taylor Swift Is Coming for Your Daughters.” The Federalist swung for the fences with a column headlined “Taylor Swift’s Popularity Is a Sign of Societal Decline.” The tantrum grew louder still when Swift was announced as Time’s Person of the Year for 2023, triggering feverish accusations of conspiracy. “What’s happening with Taylor Swift is not organic,” seethed notorious former Trump adviser Stephen Miller. The far-right X (formerly known as Twitter) account “End Wokeness” warned that “the regime has plans to weaponize her just in time for 2024.” One-time Pizzagate promoter Jack Posobiec tweeted that the “Taylor Swift girlboss psyop has been fully activated.”

This roiling paranoia about Swift’s omnipresence, combined with the Chiefs’ playoff run and Kelce’s turn as a spokesman for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, culminated in unhinged speculation about the NFL being “rigged” to carry the Swift/Kelce relationship storyline into the most-watched broadcast event of the year. This, said many extremely online conservatives — including failed presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy — would set the stage for Swift to endorse Biden for 2024, and perhaps worse calamities. Right-wing influencer Rogan O’Handley, for example, begged the San Francisco 49ers to defeat the Chiefs in the Super Bowl. “If you don’t, Mr. Pfizer and his girlfriend are going to tour the country as ‘world champions’ helping elect Joe Biden,” he tweeted, adding that World War III “will likely follow” in a second Biden term, “and millions will die.”

These kinds of comments were so outlandish, so utterly divorced from a material understanding of what could possibly hang in the balance of a football game, that some organs of conservative media tried to quell the mania. “Demonizing Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce paints the right as deranged,” wrote sports columnist Jason Whitlock for the Blaze, while the National Review, evidently unaware of their role in promoting the Swift panic, sounded a note of desperation with a piece titled “For the Love of God, Taylor Swift Is Not a Joe Biden ‘Psyop.’” Those pleas appear to have had little effect; 11 days out from the Super Bowl, far-right YouTuber Benny Johnson shared an AI-generated deepfake on X that appeared to show one local news anchor after another saying “Taylor Swift is not a psyop,” presenting the bogus clip as evidence of a nefarious plot behind the pop star’s almost universal recognition. The post was viewed more than 1 million times in nine hours.   

The release of The Tortured Poets Department in April inevitably (and unfortunately) brought a new round of grousing. Sean Feucht, the far-right “MAGA Pastor,” raised the alarm on social media, saying “half the songs” on the album “contain explicit lyrics (E), make fun of Christians, and straight up blaspheme God.” And lest you think he’s “just being religious & overreacting,” Feucht shared several apparently offending lyrics that certainly dabble in classic religious imagery, but in the most basic, writerly way imaginable.

Among the most harrowing lines, to Feucht: “I would’ve died for your sins, instead I just died inside” (from “The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived”); “What If I roll the stone away/They’re gonna crucify me anyway” (“Guilty as Sin”); and “God save the most judgmental creeps/Who say they want what’s best for me/Sanctimoniously performing soliloquies I’ll never see,” from “But Daddy I Love Him,” which definitely seems more critical of Swift’s own fans than an entire religion. 

And, of course, Shapiro got back in on the action as well with a YouTube video dubbed, “Taylor Swift’s New Album Is GARBAGE” and nuanced opinions like, “Can we stop pretending she’s high art?” and, “She’s so tortured that she’s worth billions of dollars for singing songs that are most appropriately sung by 16 and 17 year old girls.” 

Meanwhile, the conservative media’s old guard, while not going so far as to embrace the “scripted” NFL theory, took the prospect of Swift endorsing a second Biden term quite seriously: Fox News host Sean Hannity cautioned Swift to “think twice” about throwing in with Biden’s reelection campaign. Key players in MAGA world are preparing for a “holy war” against Swift should she come out in favor of Biden, as Rolling Stone has reported. Trump himself, associates said, privately grumbled that he is “more popular” than her, apparently unwavering in his belief that no celebrity, however huge, could help his incumbent rival. Yet when the former president holds you in this special contempt, well, there’s no denying that you’ve made it as an arch-nemesis of the American far right.

Late 2024: AI Fakes and Kamala Harris Endorsement

Once Biden decided to quit his reelection bid in July following a disastrous debate performance against Trump, Democrats were quick to coalesce around Vice President Kamala Harris as the party’s presidential nominee. She selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate and headlined a celebratory DNC as her campaign gathered momentum and enthusiasm.

Over these weeks, Swift faced increasing pressure to wield her influence by endorsing Harris. (Some also wondered how it might affect her newish friendship with Brittany Mahomes, wife of Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes, whose politics came under scrutiny when she liked a post from Trump on Instagram that laid out the 2024 GOP platform.) A “Swifties for Kamala” coalition emerged, made up of Swift fans mobilizing to elect progressive Democrats up and down the ballot, Harris included.

In August, evidently hoping to swoop in and create the impression that he had Swift’s endorsement locked up, Trump shared AI-generated images suggesting as much. One featured a bogus crowd scene of women marching in “Swifties for Trump” shirts, while the other depicted Swift as Uncle Sam. That one was captioned “Taylor Wants You to Vote for Donald Trump.” In his Truth Social post disseminating the images, Trump wrote, “I accept!” Later, questioned about the bogus pictures, he pleaded ignorance of their origins, saying only that someone else made them.

Clearly, elements of the far right believed they could still co-opt Swift for their own purposes, despite her record of criticizing Trump and backing Democrats. But any possibility of this evaporated once Harris and Trump met for their own debate in September, after which Swift posted her endorsement of the Harris-Walz ticket on Instagram (much to the delight of Swifties for Kamala). She cited the AI images Trump had circulated, and explained that the simplest way to combat misinformation was with the truth. Harris, she wrote, would be a strong leader, adding that she believed “we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.” She also praised Harris’ choice of Walz for VP and said she would share resources to help her followers register to vote.

Trumpworld, already reeling from a debate in which their candidate spewed outrageous lies and failed to stay on message, responded with weird threats and innuendos. “I was not a Taylor Swift fan,” Trump said the next morning when he called into Fox News. He commented that he liked Brittany Mahomes better, evidently looking to drive a wedge between the women. “But she’s a very liberal person, she seems to always endorse a Democrat,” he said of Swift, “and she’ll probably pay a price for it in the marketplace.” Trump’s running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance, also on Fox News, tried to play down Swift’s importance in the election. “I don’t think most Americans […] are going to be influenced by a billionaire celebrity who I think is fundamentally disconnected from the interests and the problems of most Americans,” he said, inadvertently offering what some would call an accurate description of Trump.

Late on the night of the debate, another out-of-touch billionaire Elon Musk — who made his support for Trump public after the July assassination attempt that saw the GOP nominee grazed by a bullet — made a creepy overture to Swift. Because she had signed her Instagram post “Childless Cat Lady” in a rebuke to Vance’s negative comments about unwed women without children, Musk wrote on X, “Fine Taylor … you win … I will give you a child and guard your cats with my life.” The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has 12 known children by various mothers and has frequently warned about “population collapse.” Many deemed the post a form of sexual harassment, while some fantasized about Kelce beating him up for it.

Right-wing political commentator Dave Rubin went a step further with his remarks the day following the debate, first praising Musk’s tweet for “exposing the ridiculousness.” He went on to imply that Swift would be sexually assaulted by migrants under a Harris administration: “Taylor Swift, you are a young pretty girl, do you know what the gang members from Venezuela do to young pretty girls?” he said. “It ain’t pretty.” Other far-right pundits kept their takes bluntly contemptuous. Ben Shapiro tweeted, “Note: if you vote for a particular candidate because your favorite singer is doing so, please don’t vote. You are too stupid to vote.”

None of it stopped Swift’s endorsement from racking up almost 10 million likes in less than a day, nor hundreds of thousands of followers from clicking on a voter registration link she shared in her Instagram stories. Overall web searches for registration resources jumped as well. It’s been a long, dramatic evolution for Swift’s political identity — not unlike the trajectory of her music career. Here, in a mature phase, she seems more poised, comfortable, and confident than ever, perfectly willing to use her platform as she likes. It may not tip the scales in a Trump-Harris showdown, but for the many people who feel a close connection to Swift, her words will resonate regardless.   

This story was updated 4/22/24 @ 12:17 p.m. ET with some reactions to The Tortured Poets Department.

This story was updated 9/11/24 @ 7:05 p.m. ET with details of Swift’s political activity during the 2024 election and the far right’s reactions.